[lkml]   [2010]   [Apr]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectPROBLEM + POSS FIX: kernel stack overflow, xfs, many disks, heavy write load, 8k stack, x86-64
Hi folks,

[I'm afraid that I'm not subscribed to the list, please cc: me on any

Problem: x86_64 kernel locks up under write-heavy
I/O load. It is "fixed" by changing THREAD_ORDER to 2.

Is this an OK long-term solution/should this be needed? As far as I can
see from searching, there is an expectation that xfs would generally
work with 8k stacks (THREAD_ORDER 1). We don't have xfs stacked over LVM
or anything else.

If anyone can offer any advice on this, that would be great. I
understand larger kernel stacks may introduce problems in getting an
allocation of the appropriate size. So am I right in thinking the
symptom we need to look out for would be an error on fork() or clone()?
Or will the box panic in that case?

Details below.



Background: We have a cluster of systems with roughly the following
specs (2GB RAM, 24 (twenty-four) 1TB+ disks, Intel Core2 Duo @ 2.2GHz).

Following a the addition of three new servers to the cluster, we started
seeing a high incidence of intermittent lockups (up to several times per
day for some servers) across both the old and new servers. Prior to
that, we saw this problem only rarely (perhaps once per 3 months).

Adding the new servers will have changed the I/O patterns to all
servers. The servers receive a heavy write load, often with many slow
writers (as well as a read load).

Servers would become unresponsive, with nothing written to
/var/log/messages. Setting sysctl kernel.panic=300 caused a restart
(which showed the kernel was panicing and unable to write at the time).
netconsole showed a variety of stack traces, mostly related to xfs_write
activity (but then, that's what the box spends it's time doing).

22/24 of the disks have 1 partition, formatted with xfs (over the
partition, not over LVM). The other 2 disks have 3 partitions: xfs data,
swap and a RAID1 partition contributing to an ext3 root filesystem
mounted on /dev/md0.

We have tried various solutions (different kernels from ubuntu server

Vanilla from + stack tracing still has the problem,
and logged:

kernel: [58552.740032] flush-8:112 used greatest stack depth: 184 bytes left

a short while before dying.

Vanilla + stack tracing + THREAD_ORDER 2 is much more stable
(no lockups so far, we would have expected 5-6 by now) and has logged:

kernel: [44798.183507] apache2 used greatest stack depth: 7208 bytes left

which I understand (possibly wrongly) as concrete evidence that we have
exceeded 8k of stack space.

 \ /
  Last update: 2010-04-07 13:15    [W:0.080 / U:5.492 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site