Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 6 Apr 2010 22:51:23 +0200 | From | Borislav Petkov <> | Subject | Re: Ugly rmap NULL ptr deref oopsie on hibernate (was Linux 2.6.34-rc3) |
| |
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Date: Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 01:02:35PM -0700
> So again, I can show that the code has never actually been through the > loop. The above code decodes to: > > 0: 3b 56 10 cmp 0x10(%rsi),%edx > 3: 73 1e jae 0x23 > 5: 48 83 fa f2 cmp $0xfffffffffffffff2,%rdx > 9: 74 18 je 0x23 > b: 48 8d 4d cc lea -0x34(%rbp),%rcx > f: 4d 89 f8 mov %r15,%r8 > 12: 48 89 df mov %rbx,%rdi > 15: e8 4d f2 ff ff callq 0xfffffffffffff267 > 1a: 41 01 c4 add %eax,%r12d > 1d: 83 7d cc 00 cmpl $0x0,-0x34(%rbp) > 21: 74 19 je 0x3c > 23: 4d 8b 6d 20 mov 0x20(%r13),%r13 > 27: 49 83 ed 20 sub $0x20,%r13 > 2b:* 49 8b 45 20 mov 0x20(%r13),%rax <-- trapping instruction > 2f: 0f 18 08 prefetcht0 (%rax) > 32: 49 8d 45 20 lea 0x20(%r13),%rax > 36: 48 39 45 80 cmp %rax,-0x80(%rbp) > 3a: 75 aa jne 0xffffffffffffffe6 > 3c: 4c 89 f7 mov %r14,%rdi > 3f: e8 .byte 0xe8 > > and in your case, if we had gone through the loop, then %rax would still > contain the return value from page_referenced_one(). > > But %rax is a kernel pointer, and %r12d is 0. > > So again, it's actually anon_vma.head.next that is NULL, not any of the > entries on the list itself. > > Now, I can see several cases for this: > > - the obvious one: anon_vma just wasn't correctly initialized, and is > missing a INIT_LIST_HEAD(&anon_vma->head). That's either a slab bug (we > don't have a whole lot of coverage of constructors), or somebody > allocated an anon_vma without using the anon_vma_cachep.
I've added code to verify this and am suspend/resuming now... Wait a minute, Linus, you're good! :) :
[ 873.083074] PM: Preallocating image memory... [ 873.254359] NULL anon_vma->head.next, page 2182681
This is the page_to_pfn number.
Now, how do we track back to the place which is missing anon_vma->head init? Can we use the struct page *page arg to page_referenced_anon() somehow?
[ 873.254654] Pid: 3642, comm: hib.sh Not tainted 2.6.34-rc3-00288-gab195c5-dirty #3 [ 873.254904] Call Trace: [ 873.255063] [<ffffffff810c0c28>] page_referenced+0xd3/0x219 [ 873.255212] [<ffffffff810c5fb0>] ? swapcache_free+0x37/0x3c [ 873.255364] [<ffffffff810ab782>] shrink_page_list+0x14a/0x477 [ 873.255512] [<ffffffff810aa6e0>] ? isolate_pages_global+0xc4/0x1f0 [ 873.255662] [<ffffffff813f8a76>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x30/0x58 [ 873.255811] [<ffffffff810abe06>] shrink_inactive_list+0x357/0x5e5 [ 873.255960] [<ffffffff810ab626>] ? shrink_active_list+0x232/0x244 [ 873.256112] [<ffffffff810ac39e>] shrink_zone+0x30a/0x3d4 [ 873.256264] [<ffffffff810acf79>] do_try_to_free_pages+0x176/0x27f [ 873.256416] [<ffffffff810ad117>] shrink_all_memory+0x95/0xc4 [ 873.256564] [<ffffffff810aa61c>] ? isolate_pages_global+0x0/0x1f0 [ 873.256713] [<ffffffff81076e4c>] ? count_data_pages+0x65/0x79 [ 873.256862] [<ffffffff810770b3>] hibernate_preallocate_memory+0x1aa/0x2cb [ 873.257036] [<ffffffff813f4f75>] ? printk+0x41/0x44 [ 873.257186] [<ffffffff81075a53>] hibernation_snapshot+0x36/0x1e1 [ 873.257337] [<ffffffff81075ccc>] hibernate+0xce/0x172 [ 873.257485] [<ffffffff81074a39>] state_store+0x5c/0xd3 [ 873.257634] [<ffffffff81184eff>] kobj_attr_store+0x17/0x19 [ 873.257783] [<ffffffff81125d43>] sysfs_write_file+0x108/0x144 [ 873.257932] [<ffffffff810d560f>] vfs_write+0xb2/0x153 [ 873.258084] [<ffffffff81063bd9>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x1f/0x14b [ 873.258237] [<ffffffff810d5773>] sys_write+0x4a/0x71 [ 873.258388] [<ffffffff810021db>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
> - Related to the above: perhaps the RCU freeing isn't working, or > slub/slab/slob ends up reusing the allocations for something else than > anonvma's, so together with the race _and_ an unlucky re-use, you get > some odd crud. > > I haven't looked at the kernel config files: do they perhaps share the > same (odd?) SLUB/SLAB/SLOB config?
what is an odd SL[AOU]B config?
> - anon_vma isn't actually an anonvma at all. 'page->mapping' was crud > with the low bit set. That sounds unlikely, but who knows. The ksm code > sets mapping to "stable_node + PAGE_MAPPING_ANON | PAGE_MAPPING_KSM" > > Did people have KSM enabled?
Nope, KSM is off here.
-- Regards/Gruss, Boris.
| |