[lkml]   [2010]   [Apr]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/3] Documentation: -stable rules: upstream commit ID requirement reworded

On Apr 24, 2010, at 11:02 AM, Greg KH wrote:
>>> Apparently Greg's scripts modify the
>>> changelogs respectively when he cherry-picks from linux-2.6.git, so the
>>> requirement is also always fulfilled with this alternative submission path.
> No, it's not a real submission patch, and yes, I always require a git
> commit id in the patch. If I don't have it, it is explained in the
> patch why it is not in Linus's tree.
> Don't worry, I think the current wording is fine.

Thanks for clarifying, I didn't realize the wording was referring to the cc: stable@ path, where the stable team adds the commit id reference themselves once it's available.

-- Ted

 \ /
  Last update: 2010-04-24 18:53    [W:0.026 / U:24.828 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site