Messages in this thread |  | | Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/3] Documentation: -stable rules: upstream commit ID requirement reworded | | From | Theodore Tso <> | | Date | Sat, 24 Apr 2010 12:50:28 -0400 |
| |
On Apr 24, 2010, at 11:02 AM, Greg KH wrote: >> >>> Apparently Greg's scripts modify the >>> changelogs respectively when he cherry-picks from linux-2.6.git, so the >>> requirement is also always fulfilled with this alternative submission path. > > No, it's not a real submission patch, and yes, I always require a git > commit id in the patch. If I don't have it, it is explained in the > patch why it is not in Linus's tree. > > Don't worry, I think the current wording is fine.
Thanks for clarifying, I didn't realize the wording was referring to the cc: stable@ path, where the stable team adds the commit id reference themselves once it's available.
-- Ted
|  |