[lkml]   [2010]   [Apr]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: What's the staging review and acceptance process?
    On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 08:42:45AM +0200, Olivier Galibert wrote:
    > On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 11:12:42PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
    > > On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 10:55:18PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
    > > > Not really, patchwork shows status immediately.
    > >
    > > Immediately when someone does something with it, right? So, the same as
    > > my development cycle?
    > I guess the main difference is that patchwork allows one contributor
    > to see that his patch has just not been checked yet, vs. missed/lost.

    In Greg's defense, I find patchwork to be fairly unwieldy (which is
    why I don't use it). It is certainly possible that I am missing some
    key feature, but my limited experience with it suggested to me that all
    the clicky-clicky stuff required to deal with the individual messages
    queued in patchwork nearly doubled my time overhead associated with
    merging patches.

    John W. Linville Someday the world will need a hero, and you might be all we have. Be ready.

     \ /
      Last update: 2010-04-22 22:27    [W:0.028 / U:24.540 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site