lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [Apr]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 3/5] uml: Fix warning due to missing task_struct declaration
On Wed, 21 Apr 2010, Amerigo Wang wrote:

> >> BTW, I don't think compile warning fixes are trivial enough to go
> >> to trivial@kernel.org.
> >
> >Why?
> >
> Usually compile warnings fixes go into -mm, some coding style fixes
> too.

Well, I personally don't care that much, submit your patches whereever you
wish.

The point of trivial tree is to take off load from other maintainers
(including Andrew) so that focusing on The Real Things is possible.

See relevant section of Documentation/SubmittingPatches.

But, as I said, I don't care that much. If you want to avoid trivial tree
for some reason, feel free to do so.

--
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2010-04-21 12:51    [W:0.037 / U:0.016 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site