Messages in this thread | | | From | Andrew Lutomirski <> | Date | Tue, 20 Apr 2010 21:37:52 -0400 | Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/3] Taming execve, setuid, and LSMs |
| |
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 8:37 AM, Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov> wrote: > On Mon, 2010-04-19 at 16:39 -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote: >> Quoting Andrew Lutomirski (luto@mit.edu): >> > 1. LSM transitions already scare me enough, and if anyone relies on >> > them working in concert with setuid, then the mere act of separating >> > them might break things, even if the "privileged" (by LSM) app in >> > question is well-written. >> >> hmm... >> >> A good point. > > At least in the case of SELinux, context transitions upon execve are > already disabled in the nosuid case, and Eric's patch updated the > SELinux test accordingly.
I don't see that code in current -linus, nor do I see where SELinux affects dumpability. What's supposed to happen? I'm writing a patch right now to clean this stuff up.
--Andy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |