[lkml]   [2010]   [Apr]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] ummunotify: Userspace support for MMU notifications
    On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 10:57:32AM -0700, Roland Dreier wrote:
    > > It is further claimed that "… other tricks are not robust". I wrote
    > > the code used in Scali/Platform MPI handling the issue. I do not
    > > think its fair to claim that this MPI is not robust in this matter
    > > nor that is performance is bad.
    > The Open MPI developers have spent a lot of effort trying to handle this
    > purely in userspace and still do not believe that a truly robust
    > solution is possible without kernel help. Perhaps they can expand on
    > what the obstacles are.
    The problem is that glibc doesn't provide correct type of hooks for MPI
    to use. You can hook into free(), but the hook is called when
    application frees memory, not when memory is returned back to the kernel
    and since MPI wants to cache registration across free()/malloc() if
    possible those hooks are not good enough. To overcome this MPI tries to
    provide its own memory management library (luckily glibc defines
    most/all memory management functions as weak) with proper hooks present, but
    that poses a whole lot of other problems and memory management is really
    not MPI's job. Even if glibc will provide proper hooks some day HPC users
    may want to use other, more performance oriented, memory management
    libraries instead of using build in glibc one. Relying on glibc hooks
    will prevent them from doing so.

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2010-04-14 11:09    [W:0.045 / U:30.380 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site