[lkml]   [2010]   [Apr]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 07/39] lmb: Add lmb_find_area()
    On 04/12/2010 10:07 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
    > On Mon, 2010-04-12 at 21:29 -0700, Yinghai wrote:
    >>> Haven't you noticed there's already way too many functions walking
    >> the
    >>> LMBs ? :-)
    >> x86 is using original lmb_reserve, lmb_free(), but have own version
    >> lmb_find_area(), and it will be dropped after
    >> more testing of generic version of lmb_find_area()
    > Do -not- add no APIs that are meant to be dropped. They never are in
    > practice. What I'm saying here is that the LMB code (including existing
    > stuff) could use some factoring in this area.

    current generic lmb_find_area() is allocating from high to low.
    x86 32bit seems have problem with that.
    in this patchset, it is fixed, but not sure if i missed sth.
    so could remove x86 lmb_find_area after more test coverage.

    >>> I think the ones doing nid alloc could/should be also rewritten to
    >> use
    >>> one single low level __lmb_find_* no ?
    >> that nid_alloc() only has one user (sparc64).
    >> maybe could be replaced by lmd_find_area_node(), but need to make sure
    >> early_node_map[] is filled at first.
    > How does it work today ? IE. Which ever mechanism is used that works I
    > don't care but we shouldn't use 2 different ones.

    x86 is only use find_area_early() with node area scope, David point that could have problem with cross node mem map.


     \ /
      Last update: 2010-04-13 07:31    [W:0.021 / U:16.848 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site