| Subject | Re: [PATCH 06/39] lmb: Seperate __lmb_find_base() from __lmb_alloc_base() | From | Benjamin Herrenschmidt <> | Date | Tue, 13 Apr 2010 13:58:01 +1000 |
| |
On Thu, 2010-04-08 at 23:03 -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> + return -1ULL; > +}
Defininf some kind of LMB_ERROR would be nicer.
Cheers, Ben.
> +u64 __init __lmb_alloc_base(u64 size, u64 align, u64 max_addr) > +{ > + u64 base; > + > + base = __lmb_find_base(size, align, max_addr); > + > + if (base == -1ULL) > + return 0; > + > + if (lmb_add_region(&lmb.reserved, base, size) < 0) > + return 0; > + > + return base; > } > > /* You must call lmb_analyze() before this. */
|