Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 09 Apr 2010 23:22:53 -0700 | From | "H. Peter Anvin" <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/9] jump label v6 |
| |
On 04/09/2010 11:16 PM, David Miller wrote: > > Finally, please abstract out the jump label and string address > type. Even on 64-bit sparc all of the kernel addresses are 32-bits > so we can use "u32" for all of the addresses jump label wants to > record. This will decrease the jump label section size. There is > at least one other 64-bit platform that can benefit from this, > which I think is s390x if I'm not mistaken. >
Even on x86 they're 32 bits -- but signed.
-hpa
-- H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
| |