Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 31 Mar 2010 23:26:52 -0700 | From | "H. Peter Anvin" <> | Subject | Re: start_kernel(): bug: interrupts were enabled early |
| |
On 03/31/2010 03:26 PM, Andrew Morton wrote: > > Not by adding overhead to every single down_read()/down_write() just to > fix a once-off startup problem - that's taking laziness way too far. >
How much overhead is this on non-x86 architectures (keep in mind x86 doesn't use this?)
-hpa
-- H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
| |