lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [Mar]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    SubjectRe: [patch 2/2] sched: fix select_idle_sibling() logic in select_task_rq_fair()
    From
    Date
    On Mon, 2010-03-08 at 14:24 -0800, Suresh Siddha wrote:
    > On Fri, 2010-03-05 at 12:25 -0800, Mike Galbraith wrote:
    > > On Fri, 2010-03-05 at 10:39 -0800, Suresh Siddha wrote:
    > > > plain text document attachment (fix_lat_ctx.patch)
    > > > Performance improvements with this patch:
    > > > "lat_ctx -s 0 2" ~22usec (before-this-patch) ~5usec (after-this-patch)
    > >
    > > Hm. On my Q6600 box, it's nowhere near that.
    >
    > My numbers are based on an atom netbook.

    Wish I had an atom to play with, hard to even imagine 22 usec lat_ctx,
    that's some _serious_ pain.

    > > Calling the waking cpu idle in that case is a mistake. Just because the
    > > sync hint was used does not mean there is no gain to be had.
    >
    > Ok. I dropped that part in v2 patches that I just posted.

    Yeah, I see mails (ramble ramble) crossed in the night. I'll take them
    out for a spin, see if your box can get fixed up without busting mine :)

    -Mike



    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2010-03-09 07:09    [W:1.741 / U:123.172 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site