[lkml]   [2010]   [Mar]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] ARM: mach-sa1100: Put nanoEngine support back in the kernel.
Hi Kristoffer,

On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 13:52, Kristoffer Ericson
<> wrote:
> Without testing it on the actual hardware it applies and looks good, compilation also goes smoothly without any issues.
> It looks quite alright to me. What are you planning to do with the fixup function?

Sorry, this function was the first things I wrote, but the kernel 2.6
infrastructure made it totally unnecessary and it should have been
removed. I will do it and send another patch.

> Im just missing the licensing text in the nano...c file for future reference,

Ok, I will add it too.

> after that feel free to add:
> Acked-by: Kristoffer Ericson <>
> Best wishes
> Kristoffer


 \ /
  Last update: 2010-03-09 19:01    [W:0.041 / U:8.796 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site