Messages in this thread | | | From | Mike Frysinger <> | Date | Tue, 9 Mar 2010 10:56:51 -0500 | Subject | Re: [PATCH 00/24] Rename kernel's magic sections for compatibility with -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections |
| |
On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 23:03, Tim Abbott wrote: > On Sat, 20 Feb 2010, Denys Vlasenko wrote: >> Here is a new version of the -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections patch >> series based on current Linus tree. > > Aside from patch 17, which I would prefer that Haavard review, these > patches look correct (and patch 17 can be safely dropped). Please > consider the rest of Denys' patches in this patch series > > Acked-by: Tim Abbott <tabbott@ksplice.com> > > The patches still apply fine on Linus' current master. There are no merge > conflicts with linux-next's current master, but we will need to do > something to merge with > > "Blackfin: initial XIP support" > > in linux-next, which introduces a direct reference to .data.percpu.* (not > using the normal PERCPU macros so they can put .data.percpu content inside > the .init.data section). That conflict looks easy to deal with by adding > a new macro to handle this case (CCing the author and blackfin maintainer; > it's possible that this blackfin patch is going in soon, in which case we > can just rebase these patches on top). > > Michal, what are your thoughts on this patch series? The kbuild tree > would be a reasonable path for merging these patches.
ive posted this patch for merging via the Blackfin tree now, so hopefully it'll be in soon -mike -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |