[lkml]   [2010]   [Mar]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 00/24] Rename kernel's magic sections for compatibility with -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections
On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 23:03, Tim Abbott wrote:
> On Sat, 20 Feb 2010, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
>> Here is a new version of the -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections patch
>> series based on current Linus tree.
> Aside from patch 17, which I would prefer that Haavard review, these
> patches look correct (and patch 17 can be safely dropped).  Please
> consider the rest of Denys' patches in this patch series
> Acked-by: Tim Abbott <>
> The patches still apply fine on Linus' current master.  There are no merge
> conflicts with linux-next's current master, but we will need to do
> something to merge with
> "Blackfin: initial XIP support"
> in linux-next, which introduces a direct reference to .data.percpu.* (not
> using the normal PERCPU macros so they can put .data.percpu content inside
> the section).  That conflict looks easy to deal with by adding
> a new macro to handle this case (CCing the author and blackfin maintainer;
> it's possible that this blackfin patch is going in soon, in which case we
> can just rebase these patches on top).
> Michal, what are your thoughts on this patch series?  The kbuild tree
> would be a reasonable path for merging these patches.

ive posted this patch for merging via the Blackfin tree now, so
hopefully it'll be in soon
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2010-03-09 16:59    [W:0.133 / U:0.052 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site