lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [Mar]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [patch 2/2] sched: fix select_idle_sibling() logic in select_task_rq_fair()
From
Date
On Fri, 2010-03-05 at 12:25 -0800, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-03-05 at 10:39 -0800, Suresh Siddha wrote:
> > plain text document attachment (fix_lat_ctx.patch)
> > Performance improvements with this patch:
> > "lat_ctx -s 0 2" ~22usec (before-this-patch) ~5usec (after-this-patch)
>
> Hm. On my Q6600 box, it's nowhere near that.

My numbers are based on an atom netbook.

> Calling the waking cpu idle in that case is a mistake. Just because the
> sync hint was used does not mean there is no gain to be had.

Ok. I dropped that part in v2 patches that I just posted.

thanks,
suresh



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2010-03-08 23:27    [W:0.049 / U:0.636 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site