[lkml]   [2010]   [Mar]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: O_NONBLOCK is NOOP on block devices
M vd S <> writes:

>> > > If O_NONBLOCK is meaningful whatsoever (see man page docs for
>> > > semantics) against block devices, one would expect a nonblocking io
>> >
>> > It isn't...
>> Thanks for the reply. It's good to get confirmation that I am not all
>> alone in an alternate non blocking universe. The linux man pages
>> actually had me convinced O_NONBLOCK would actually keep a process
>> from blocking on device io :-)
> You're even less alone, I'm running into the same issue just now. But
> I think I've found a way around it, see below.

I guess I should note that I've suggested nonblocking I/O for files

I'll also note that enabling such a patch broke apps that accessed cd
burners, for example, since O_NONBLOCK had some preexisting semantics
there that I fail to recall.


 \ /
  Last update: 2010-03-05 17:05    [W:0.097 / U:3.696 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site