[lkml]   [2010]   [Mar]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [git pull] drm request 3
    On Thu, Mar 04, 2010 at 05:08:00PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
    > On Fri, 5 Mar 2010, Luc Verhaegen wrote:
    > >
    > > libdrm is composed of the main libdrm, and several driver specific
    > > libdrms today (... and libkms, yes).
    > It's actually not libdrm that is the primary issue, I'm sorry for saying
    > that.
    > It's the thing - the actual X driver.
    > Anyway, since I had looked at the libdrm sources, I had most of this on my
    > machine anyway, so I've compiled it all, and am going to reboot and see if
    > I can make a few symlinks work.
    > IOW, right now I have this:
    > [root@nehalem ~]# cd /usr/lib64/xorg/modules/drivers/
    > [root@nehalem drivers]# ll*
    > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 21 2010-03-04 17:00 ->
    > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 343784 2010-03-04 16:59
    > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 1698805 2010-03-04 16:59
    > and I'll see if that works (yeah, yeah, I didn't strip the thing, and
    > it's compiled with whatever defaults that probably include debugging too,
    > so it's huge).
    > Quite frankly, I still think that I shouldn't have to play these kinds of
    > games. I think the versioning should be built in. And I still think that
    > "staging" is not an excuse for "it's bad crap, and we don't care"
    > Linus

    In an ideal world, you shouldn't be forced to update anything except
    some/all of the driver bits.

    But the fact that libdrm is lumped together as it is, and that mesa is a
    monolith, forces you to update a more significant portion of your
    system. You have to resort to some serious manual labour to get around
    that atm.

    Luc Verhaegen.

     \ /
      Last update: 2010-03-05 02:19    [W:0.034 / U:7.468 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site