Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 30 Mar 2010 10:52:38 -0400 | From | Aristeu Sergio Rozanski Filho <> | Subject | Re: [watchdog] combine nmi_watchdog and softlockup |
| |
> On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 10:46:50PM -0400, Aristeu Sergio Rozanski Filho wrote: > > Hi Don, > > > +/* deprecated */ > > > +static int __init nosoftlockup_setup(char *str) > > > +{ > > > + no_watchdog = 1; > > > + return 1; > > > +} > > > +__setup("nosoftlockup", nosoftlockup_setup); > > > +static int __init nonmi_watchdog_setup(char *str) > > > +{ > > > + no_watchdog = 1; > > > + return 1; > > > +} > > > +__setup("nonmi_watchdog", nonmi_watchdog_setup); > > didn't you just add nonmi_watchdog parameter? I don't think there's a reason > > to keep compatibility here. > > Hmm, I think you are right. I thought I added that because it existed in > the old nmi_watchdog setup but I can't find it. So yeah, I can drop that. you could provide a nmi_watchdog=0 backwards compatibility and warn about values != 0
-- Aristeu
| |