Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 3 Mar 2010 18:01:03 +0100 | From | Fabio Checconi <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 3/3] sched: make runtime balancing code more EDF-friendly |
| |
> From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> > Date: Thu, Feb 25, 2010 09:28:26PM +0100 > > On Tue, 2010-02-23 at 19:56 +0100, Fabio Checconi wrote: > > + stop = move_runtime(rt_rq, iter, weight, rt_period, > > pull); > > + if (stop) { > > + raw_spin_unlock(&iter->rt_runtime_lock); > > + break; > > } > > next: > > raw_spin_unlock(&iter->rt_runtime_lock); > > might as well put that: > > if (stop) > break; > > right after the raw_spin_unlock() that's already there.
Will do (initializing stop to false before entering the loop), thanks.
| |