Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 27 Mar 2010 10:36:00 -0700 (PDT) | Subject | Re: CVE-2009-4537 | From | David Miller <> |
| |
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2010 10:34:07 -0700 (PDT)
> From: Michael Gilbert <michael.s.gilbert@gmail.com> > Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2010 14:21:00 -0400 > >> Hi, >> >> CVE-2009-4537 has been disclosed without any upstream activity for a >> while now. Discussion about the issue dried up in January [0], and a >> patch had been proposed [1], but no arguments were seen either for or >> against it. Note that redhat has already shipped that in their various >> kernel security updates. Would it make sense to merge those changes >> officially? > > A different version of the fix went into the tree.
Ignore me, that was a fix for a different problem.
I was waiting for Francois to come up with a cleaner fix but he stopped working on it, so yes I should put in the fix you mention or something similar.
Neil, can you formally submit a version of the r8169 CVE for upstream?
Thanks.
| |