[lkml]   [2010]   [Mar]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] trace power_frequency events on the correct cpu (for Intel x86 CPUs)
On 3/23/2010 9:57, Thomas Renninger wrote:
> On Tuesday 23 March 2010 17:28:36 Robert Schöne wrote:
>> Am Montag, den 22.03.2010, 06:57 -0700 schrieb Arjan van de Ven:
>>> On 3/22/2010 0:04, Robert Schöne wrote:
>>>> Am Sonntag, den 21.03.2010, 17:42 -0700 schrieb Arjan van de Ven:
>>>>> On 3/20/2010 14:37, Thomas Renninger wrote:
>>>>>> It also seem to be (hopefully) a minor feature for timechart, so this should
>>>>>> not hurt that much (yet).
>>>>> It's actually a major feature for timechart, and one of the key things I and a bunch of others
>>>>> inside Intel use timechart for.
>>>> It's a major feature for us too.
>>>> I suppose, the cpufreq_notify_transition calls are correct (meaning
>>>> being called for all related cpus) for every driver. So there's still
>>>> the option to include it in the POST_CHANGE section of this function.
>>>> Could this be okay for the both of you?
>>> post change would work... that gets frequency afaik..
>> Are you ok with this too, Thomas?
> You mean hooking it into cpufreq_stat_notifier_trans() in
> drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_stats.c?


hooking into the post frequency change callback that gets done..
which is guaranteed to be on the right cpu afaics.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2010-03-23 18:01    [W:0.050 / U:0.696 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site