[lkml]   [2010]   [Mar]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] trace power_frequency events on the correct cpu (for Intel x86 CPUs)
    On 3/23/2010 9:57, Thomas Renninger wrote:
    > On Tuesday 23 March 2010 17:28:36 Robert Schöne wrote:
    >> Am Montag, den 22.03.2010, 06:57 -0700 schrieb Arjan van de Ven:
    >>> On 3/22/2010 0:04, Robert Schöne wrote:
    >>>> Am Sonntag, den 21.03.2010, 17:42 -0700 schrieb Arjan van de Ven:
    >>>>> On 3/20/2010 14:37, Thomas Renninger wrote:
    >>>>>> It also seem to be (hopefully) a minor feature for timechart, so this should
    >>>>>> not hurt that much (yet).
    >>>>> It's actually a major feature for timechart, and one of the key things I and a bunch of others
    >>>>> inside Intel use timechart for.
    >>>> It's a major feature for us too.
    >>>> I suppose, the cpufreq_notify_transition calls are correct (meaning
    >>>> being called for all related cpus) for every driver. So there's still
    >>>> the option to include it in the POST_CHANGE section of this function.
    >>>> Could this be okay for the both of you?
    >>> post change would work... that gets frequency afaik..
    >> Are you ok with this too, Thomas?
    > You mean hooking it into cpufreq_stat_notifier_trans() in
    > drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_stats.c?


    hooking into the post frequency change callback that gets done..
    which is guaranteed to be on the right cpu afaics.
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2010-03-23 18:01    [W:0.022 / U:6.344 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site