[lkml]   [2010]   [Mar]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 06/20] early_res: seperate common memmap func from e820.c to fw_memmap.c

* Benjamin Herrenschmidt <> wrote:

> On Mon, 2010-03-22 at 10:28 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:

> > Note the other side of the coin: LMB appears to be deployed on only 4
> > non-x86 architectures that muster ~1% of the Linux boxes while early_res
> > is deployed on more than 95%.
> You use that arguemnt ONE MORE FUCKING TIME and you'll end up in my killfile
> with a auto-NACK reply of anything that looks like a patch from you.

Does this mean you disagree with that? (I think it's pretty factual, last i
checked the usage stats of devel kernels was somewhere around 99.7%.)

In any case, i dont dispute that LMB is a bit cleaner than kernel/early_res.c
- and both are much cleaner than the new e820 kernel/fw_memmap.c code posted
here by Yinghai.

If you dont disagree then please spare me the insults. (or move me into your



 \ /
  Last update: 2010-03-22 21:59    [W:0.147 / U:1.932 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site