[lkml]   [2010]   [Mar]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH][RF C/T/D] Unmapped page cache control - via boot parameter
On 03/17/2010 10:49 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 01:08:28PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
>> If the batch size is larger than the virtio queue size, or if there are
>> no flushes at all, then yes the huge write cache gives more opportunity
>> for reordering. But we're already talking hundreds of requests here.
> Yes. And rememember those don't have to come from the same host. Also
> remember that we rather limit execssive reodering of O_DIRECT requests
> in the I/O scheduler because they are "synchronous" type I/O while
> we don't do that for pagecache writeback.

Maybe we should relax that for kvm. Perhaps some of the problem comes
from the fact that we call io_submit() once per request.

> And we don't have unlimited virtio queue size, in fact it's quite
> limited.

That can be extended easily if it fixes the problem.

error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

 \ /
  Last update: 2010-03-17 10:13    [W:0.105 / U:0.584 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site