[lkml]   [2010]   [Mar]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: 64-syscall args on 32-bit vs syscall()
On 03/17/2010 01:35 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-03-17 at 11:30 -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>> Again, this is *exactly* symbol versioning done by hand... we have
>> proper symbol versioning, let's use it.
> Yeah, whatever, I don't mind what technique you use for the versionning,
> ultimately, if the approach works, we can look at those details :-) We
> -do- need the macro to strip the dummy argument though, unless we use
> a slightly different technique which is to make the __sysno argument
> itself 64-bit, which works as well I believe.

It seems cleaner to do it that way (with a 64-bit sysno arg.)


 \ /
  Last update: 2010-03-17 21:59    [W:0.106 / U:12.712 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site