[lkml]   [2010]   [Mar]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: 64-syscall args on 32-bit vs syscall()
    On 03/17/2010 01:35 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
    > On Wed, 2010-03-17 at 11:30 -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
    >> Again, this is *exactly* symbol versioning done by hand... we have
    >> proper symbol versioning, let's use it.
    > Yeah, whatever, I don't mind what technique you use for the versionning,
    > ultimately, if the approach works, we can look at those details :-) We
    > -do- need the macro to strip the dummy argument though, unless we use
    > a slightly different technique which is to make the __sysno argument
    > itself 64-bit, which works as well I believe.

    It seems cleaner to do it that way (with a 64-bit sysno arg.)


     \ /
      Last update: 2010-03-17 21:59    [W:0.025 / U:5.428 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site