lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [Mar]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] r8169: Fix rtl8169_rx_interrupt()
Hello,

Eric, I did pktgen testing (3 times).

sudo cat /proc/net/pktgen/eth0
Params: count 1000000000 min_pkt_size: 42 max_pkt_size: 42
frags: 0 delay: 0 clone_skb: 4000000 ifname: eth0
flows: 0 flowlen: 0
queue_map_min: 0 queue_map_max: 0
dst_min: 10.6.22.59 dst_max:
src_min: src_max:
src_mac: 00:1a:92:c9:a0:68 dst_mac: 00:1a:92:c9:a0:68
udp_src_min: 9 udp_src_max: 9 udp_dst_min: 9 udp_dst_max: 9
src_mac_count: 0 dst_mac_count: 0
Flags:
Current:
pkts-sofar: 1000000000 errors: 0
started: 9957912410us stopped: 16682620361us idle: 1231us
seq_num: 1000000001 cur_dst_mac_offset: 0 cur_src_mac_offset: 0
cur_saddr: 0x3b16060a cur_daddr: 0x3b16060a
cur_udp_dst: 9 cur_udp_src: 9
cur_queue_map: 0
flows: 0
Result: OK: 6724707951(c6724706719+d1231) nsec, 1000000000 (42byte,0frags)
148705pps 49Mb/sec (49964880bps) errors: 0


Without any errors from the r8169 side. Can we consider testing successful?
If so, fell free to add Tested-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>


Sergey



On (03/16/10 01:33), Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > Yes, this is wrong. In this context (process context, not softirq), we
> > should use netif_rx() or just drop frames if we are in reset phase.
> >
>
> Sergey,
>
> Here is a compiled but untested patch (I dont have the hardware), could
> you please test it ?
>
> Thanks
>
> [PATCH] r8169: Fix rtl8169_rx_interrupt()
>
> In case a reset is performed, rtl8169_rx_interrupt() is called from
> process context instead of softirq context. Special care must be taken
> to call appropriate network core services (netif_rx() instead of
> netif_receive_skb()). VLAN handling also corrected.
>
> Reported-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
> Diagnosed-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
> ---
> diff --git a/drivers/net/r8169.c b/drivers/net/r8169.c
> index 9d3ebf3..d873639 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/r8169.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/r8169.c
> @@ -1038,14 +1038,14 @@ static void rtl8169_vlan_rx_register(struct net_device *dev,
> }
>
> static int rtl8169_rx_vlan_skb(struct rtl8169_private *tp, struct RxDesc *desc,
> - struct sk_buff *skb)
> + struct sk_buff *skb, int polling)
> {
> u32 opts2 = le32_to_cpu(desc->opts2);
> struct vlan_group *vlgrp = tp->vlgrp;
> int ret;
>
> if (vlgrp && (opts2 & RxVlanTag)) {
> - vlan_hwaccel_receive_skb(skb, vlgrp, swab16(opts2 & 0xffff));
> + __vlan_hwaccel_rx(skb, vlgrp, swab16(opts2 & 0xffff), polling);
> ret = 0;
> } else
> ret = -1;
> @@ -1062,7 +1062,7 @@ static inline u32 rtl8169_tx_vlan_tag(struct rtl8169_private *tp,
> }
>
> static int rtl8169_rx_vlan_skb(struct rtl8169_private *tp, struct RxDesc *desc,
> - struct sk_buff *skb)
> + struct sk_buff *skb, int polling)
> {
> return -1;
> }
> @@ -4429,12 +4429,20 @@ out:
> return done;
> }
>
> +/*
> + * Warning : rtl8169_rx_interrupt() might be called :
> + * 1) from NAPI (softirq) context
> + * (polling = 1 : we should call netif_receive_skb())
> + * 2) from process context (rtl8169_reset_task())
> + * (polling = 0 : we must call netif_rx() instead)
> + */
> static int rtl8169_rx_interrupt(struct net_device *dev,
> struct rtl8169_private *tp,
> void __iomem *ioaddr, u32 budget)
> {
> unsigned int cur_rx, rx_left;
> unsigned int delta, count;
> + int polling = (budget != ~(u32)0) ? 1 : 0;
>
> cur_rx = tp->cur_rx;
> rx_left = NUM_RX_DESC + tp->dirty_rx - cur_rx;
> @@ -4496,8 +4504,12 @@ static int rtl8169_rx_interrupt(struct net_device *dev,
> skb_put(skb, pkt_size);
> skb->protocol = eth_type_trans(skb, dev);
>
> - if (rtl8169_rx_vlan_skb(tp, desc, skb) < 0)
> - netif_receive_skb(skb);
> + if (rtl8169_rx_vlan_skb(tp, desc, skb, polling) < 0) {
> + if (likely(polling))
> + netif_receive_skb(skb);
> + else
> + netif_rx(skb);
> + }
>
> dev->stats.rx_bytes += pkt_size;
> dev->stats.rx_packets++;
>
>
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2010-03-16 15:57    [W:0.084 / U:0.292 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site