lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [Mar]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
Date
From
Subject[patch] udf: potential integer overflow
bloc->logicalBlockNum is unsigned so it's never less than zero.

When I saw that, it made me worry that "bloc->logicalBlockNum + count"
could overflow. That's why I changed the check for less than zero
to an overflow check. (The test works because "count" is also
unsigned.)

Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com>
---
GCC 4.1 apparently optimizes overflow checks like this away, but it should
work for other versions of gcc. I tested with GCC 4.3.
http://www.fefe.de/intof.html

diff --git a/fs/udf/balloc.c b/fs/udf/balloc.c
index 19626e2..9a9378b 100644
--- a/fs/udf/balloc.c
+++ b/fs/udf/balloc.c
@@ -125,9 +125,8 @@ static void udf_bitmap_free_blocks(struct super_block *sb,

mutex_lock(&sbi->s_alloc_mutex);
partmap = &sbi->s_partmaps[bloc->partitionReferenceNum];
- if (bloc->logicalBlockNum < 0 ||
- (bloc->logicalBlockNum + count) >
- partmap->s_partition_len) {
+ if (bloc->logicalBlockNum + count < count ||
+ (bloc->logicalBlockNum + count) > partmap->s_partition_len) {
udf_debug("%d < %d || %d + %d > %d\n",
bloc->logicalBlockNum, 0, bloc->logicalBlockNum,
count, partmap->s_partition_len);
@@ -393,9 +392,8 @@ static void udf_table_free_blocks(struct super_block *sb,

mutex_lock(&sbi->s_alloc_mutex);
partmap = &sbi->s_partmaps[bloc->partitionReferenceNum];
- if (bloc->logicalBlockNum < 0 ||
- (bloc->logicalBlockNum + count) >
- partmap->s_partition_len) {
+ if (bloc->logicalBlockNum + count < count ||
+ (bloc->logicalBlockNum + count) > partmap->s_partition_len) {
udf_debug("%d < %d || %d + %d > %d\n",
bloc->logicalBlockNum, 0, bloc->logicalBlockNum, count,
partmap->s_partition_len);

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2010-03-15 09:23    [W:0.058 / U:8.488 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site