lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [Mar]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: 64-syscall args on 32-bit vs syscall()
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 03/15/2010 08:13 AM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> One option would be to do a libkernel.so,

No need. Put it in the vdso. And name it something other than syscall.
The syscall() API is fixed, you cannot change it.

All this only if it makes sense for ALL archs. If it cannot work for
just one arch then it's not worth it at all.

- --
➧ Ulrich Drepper ➧ Red Hat, Inc. ➧ 444 Castro St ➧ Mountain View, CA ❖
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAkueWbcACgkQ2ijCOnn/RHRtBQCeP88S/0xei7CAt65AGboqsrC8
N7wAoK7Qbi+OZuQrgHTCgTA27TgY+gQU
=4tJ6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2010-03-15 17:03    [W:0.054 / U:13.440 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site