Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 13 Mar 2010 22:56:00 +0100 (CET) | From | Jiri Kosina <> | Subject | Writable limits (was Re: Linux 2.6.34-rc1) |
| |
On Mon, 8 Mar 2010, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> > It's out there now. I still have a few trees I already got pull requests > > for, and that I want to look over a bit more (ceph, gdb tree etc), and > > it's possible that I've just overlooked some other pull request. > > > > So if you feel like you sent me a pull request bit might have been > > over-looked, please point that out to me > > Hi, yes, the writable limits tree: > http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/3/5/219 > > Maybe it was ignored on purpose. Either way, I would like to know to > decide whether to drop it from -next or not and wait for a 2.6.35 merge > window.
Seems like this was neither commented on, nor merged. I don't see any serious objections to having this merged having been raised anywhere ...
Any word on this?
-- Jiri Kosina SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.
| |