lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [Mar]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/2] rfkill sysfs ABI
On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 19:03:06 +0100
florian@mickler.org wrote:

> Hi all!
>
> The first patch moves the rfkill sysfs ABI Documentation to Documentation/ABI
> and deprecates the state and claim file.
>
> The second patch creates a replacement for the state file. Instead of exporting
> some made-up state we just export the state of the 2 kill lines.
>
> The first patch should probably go into 2.6.34, as to warn users
> (if there are any) early about this removal.
> If there is no intent to remove the broken files, the feature-removal-schedule hunk
> should probably be skipped.
>
> Cheers,
> Flo
>
> p.s.: first discussion of this: http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/2/22/127
>

Hi,

sorry! I just realised that you already have the blocked_sw / blocked_hw one's
queued.

This just changes the name of blocked_sw and blocked_hw to "soft" and
"hard".

I don't know what you wanna do. I'm fine with blocked_hw and
blocked_sw as it's referenced as such (hw/sw) in the code, but Marcel
wanted to get away from the "hard blocked by hardware" notation, as it
suggests that the transmitter could only be blocked by hardware...

cheers,
Flo


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2010-03-12 19:21    [W:0.038 / U:0.236 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site