lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [Mar]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
Date
From
Subject[PATCH] v9fs: Skip check for mandatory locks when unlocking
While investigating a bug, I came across a possible bug in v9fs. The problem is similar to the one reported for NFS by ASANO Masahiro in http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/12/21/334. 

v9fs_file_lock() will skip locks on file which has mode set to 02666. This is a problem in cases where the mode of the file is changed after a process has obtained a lock on the file. Such a lock will be skipped during unlock and the machine will end up with a BUG in locks_remove_flock().

v9fs_file_lock() should skip the check for mandatory locks when unlocking a file.

Signed-off-by: Sachin Prabhu <sprabhu@redhat.com>
diff -up linux-2.6/fs/9p/vfs_file.c.9p linux-2.6/fs/9p/vfs_file.c
--- linux-2.6/fs/9p/vfs_file.c.9p 2010-03-11 17:32:52.000000000 +0000
+++ linux-2.6/fs/9p/vfs_file.c 2010-03-11 17:33:11.000000000 +0000
@@ -114,7 +114,7 @@ static int v9fs_file_lock(struct file *f
P9_DPRINTK(P9_DEBUG_VFS, "filp: %p lock: %p\n", filp, fl);

/* No mandatory locks */
- if (__mandatory_lock(inode))
+ if (__mandatory_lock(inode) && fl->fl_type != F_UNLCK)
return -ENOLCK;

if ((IS_SETLK(cmd) || IS_SETLKW(cmd)) && fl->fl_type != F_UNLCK) {

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2010-03-11 19:31    [W:0.020 / U:6.936 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site