[lkml]   [2010]   [Mar]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/9] oprofile, perf, x86: introduce new functions to reserve perfctrs
On Thu, 2010-03-04 at 18:59 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-03-04 at 16:22 +0100, Robert Richter wrote:
> > This patch set improves the perfctr reservation code. New functions
> > are available to reserve a counter by its index only. It is no longer
> > necessary to allocate both msrs of a counter which also improves the
> > code and makes it easier.
> >
> > For oprofile a handler is implemented that returns an error now if a
> > counter is already reserved by a different subsystem such as perf or
> > watchdog. Before, oprofile silently ignored that counter. Finally the
> > new reservation functions can be used to allocate special parts of the
> > pmu such as IBS, which is necessary to use IBS with perf too.
> >
> > The patches are available in the oprofile tree:
> >
> > git:// core
> >
> > If there are no objections, I suggest to merge it into the
> > tip/perf/core too, maybe after pending patches went in. If there are
> > already conflicts, I will do the merge for this.
> Right, so cleaning up that reservation code is nice, but wouldn't it be
> much nicer to simply do away with all that and make everything use the
> (low level) perf code?

Alternatively, could we maybe further simplify this reservation into:

int reserve_pmu(void);
void release_pmu(void);

And not bother with anything finer grained.

 \ /
  Last update: 2010-03-11 12:51    [W:0.118 / U:1.280 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site