lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [Mar]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] cfq-iosched: quantum check tweak --resend
On Mon, Mar 01 2010, Shaohua Li wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 04:02:34PM +0800, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 01 2010, Shaohua Li wrote:
> > > Currently a queue can only dispatch up to 4 requests if there are other queues.
> > > This isn't optimal, device can handle more requests, for example, AHCI can
> > > handle 31 requests. I can understand the limit is for fairness, but we could
> > > do a tweak: if the queue still has a lot of slice left, sounds we could
> > > ignore the limit. Test shows this boost my workload (two thread randread of
> > > a SSD) from 78m/s to 100m/s.
> > > Thanks for suggestions from Corrado and Vivek for the patch.
> >
> > As mentioned before, I think we definitely want to ensure that we drive
> > the full queue depth whenever possible. I think your patch is a bit
> > dangerous, though. The problematic workload here is a buffered write,
> > interleaved with the occasional sync reader. If the sync reader has to
> > endure 32 requests every time, latency rises dramatically for him.
> the patch still matains a hardlimit for dispatched request. For a async,
> the limit is cfq_slice_async/cfq_slice_idle = 5. For sync, the limit is 8.
> And we only pipe out such number of requests at the begining of a slice.
> For the workload you mentioned here, we only dispatch 1 extra request.

OK, that sound appropriate. Final question - why change the quantum and
use quantum/2?

--
Jens Axboe



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2010-03-01 09:21    [W:0.047 / U:0.056 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site