lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [Feb]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] sysfs: differentiate between locking links and non-links
    Hello,

    On 02/10/2010 11:08 AM, Américo Wang wrote:
    > This bug report is new for me. Recently we received lots of sysfs lockdep
    > warnings, I am working on a patch to fix all the bogus ones.
    >
    > However, this one is _not_ similar to the other cases, as you decribed.
    > This patch could fix the problem, but not a good fix, IMO. We need more
    > work in sysfs layer to fix this kind of things. I will take care of this.

    Can't we just give each s_active lock a separate class? Would that be
    too costly?

    Thanks.

    --
    tejun
    --
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2010-02-10 03:15    [W:6.577 / U:0.168 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site