[lkml]   [2010]   [Feb]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] Restrict stack space reservation to rlimit
> Hi,
> > Why do we need page size independent stack size? It seems to have
> > compatibility breaking risk.
> I don't think so. The current behaviour is clearly wrong, we dont need a
> 16x larger stack just because you went from a 4kB to a 64kB base page
> size. The user application stack usage is the same in both cases.

I didn't discuss which behavior is better. Michael said he want to apply
his patch to 2.6.32 & 2.6.33. stable tree never accept the breaking
compatibility patch.

Your answer doesn't explain why can't we wait it until next merge window.

btw, personally, I like page size indepent stack size. but I'm not sure
why making stack size independency is related to bug fix.

 \ /
  Last update: 2010-02-08 06:25    [W:0.071 / U:1.748 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site