[lkml]   [2010]   [Feb]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] Restrict stack space reservation to rlimit
    > Hi,
    > > Why do we need page size independent stack size? It seems to have
    > > compatibility breaking risk.
    > I don't think so. The current behaviour is clearly wrong, we dont need a
    > 16x larger stack just because you went from a 4kB to a 64kB base page
    > size. The user application stack usage is the same in both cases.

    I didn't discuss which behavior is better. Michael said he want to apply
    his patch to 2.6.32 & 2.6.33. stable tree never accept the breaking
    compatibility patch.

    Your answer doesn't explain why can't we wait it until next merge window.

    btw, personally, I like page size indepent stack size. but I'm not sure
    why making stack size independency is related to bug fix.

     \ /
      Last update: 2010-02-08 06:25    [W:0.022 / U:9.840 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site