lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [Feb]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [RFC][PATCH] PERF_COUNT_SW_RUNNABLE_TASKS: measure and act upon parallellism
From
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 11:00 AM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
> On Sun, 2010-02-07 at 12:30 +0100, highguy@gmail.com wrote:
>
>> Here's an initial RFC patch for the parallallism
>> events for perf_events.
>
> OK, so you managed to rub me totally the wrong way with posting this
> yesterday:
>  - you send me each patch twice
>  - you used the horrible git sendmail default of --chain-reply-to
>   (some day I'll write a script that will detect and auto-bounce
>    series sent to me like that)
>  - you failed to provide a changelog for any of the patches
>  - some subjects were long enough to be a changelog
>
> Please don't do that again ;-)

Sorry for that. I'm still getting used to the thing called 'git'. Apart
from obviously sharing its name, there's not so
much we have in common so far... VCS experiences currently
don't go far beyond svn and the horrid CVS.
I just used the reply-list from the initial series about this subject,
perhaps you were listed twice in that one as well.

Isn't no longer making --chain-reply-to the default an option?

>
> Anyway, it did get me thinking, how about something like the below?
> <SNIP>

That pretty much looks like what I need at first sight. I'll definately
give it a very close look and test it out.
The perf_event approach would be nice, but the implementations
just seem to collide.

Thanks for taking the time anyway,
Stijn
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2010-02-08 12:55    [W:0.046 / U:0.128 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site