[lkml]   [2010]   [Feb]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Linux 2.6.33-rc7
    On Sat, Feb 06, 2010 at 02:49:49PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
    > Would it be ok to _only_ have the 'bz2' patches and tar-balls?
    > Having two copies of every large file seems silly, if nobody really
    > requires the traditional .gz format..

    When I grab tarballs, I only grab .gz. Bandwidth isn't a
    problem (3 minutes versus four on my DSL, I still switch over to another
    screen and check back). But .bz2 unpacks very slowly in the
    environments I'm usually grabbing a tarball for. I save more time
    unpacking .gz than I do downloading .bz2.
    That said, I'm often doing repeated unpacks, so I could easily
    turn a .bz2 into .gz when I first grab it, then use the local .gz.



    "The nice thing about egotists is that they don't talk about other
    - Lucille S. Harper

    Joel Becker
    Principal Software Developer
    Phone: (650) 506-8127

     \ /
      Last update: 2010-02-07 11:23    [W:0.020 / U:7.512 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site