lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [Feb]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] exit: PR_SET_ANCHOR for marking processes as reapers for child processes
On Wed, 03.02.10 23:31, Américo Wang (xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com) wrote:

> On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 01:04:57PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> >
> >This patch adds a simple flag for each process that marks it as an
> >"anchor" process for all its children and grandchildren. If a child of
> >such an anchor dies all its children will not be reparented to init, but
> >instead to this anchor, escaping this anchor process is not possible. A
> >task with this flag set hence acts is little "sub-init".
>
> This will break the applictions which using 'getppid() == 1' to check
> if its real parent is dead or not...

Usage of the PR_SETANCHOR flag is optional for a process. It won't
break anything unless enabled. So I don't really see a problem here.

Of course, when this flag is used the behaviour is different from what
traditional Unix says what happens with the children of a process when
it dies. But uh, that's the whole point and that's why this flag is
enabled optionally only.

Also, on a side note: code that checks if its parent process died most
likely should rewritten to use PR_DEATHSIG or something like that
anyway, so that it is notified about the parent dying instead of
polling for it manually.

Lennart

--
Lennart Poettering Red Hat, Inc.
lennart [at] poettering [dot] net
http://0pointer.net/lennart/ GnuPG 0x1A015CC4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2010-02-03 18:53    [W:0.179 / U:1.516 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site