Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 27 Feb 2010 09:53:19 +0100 | Subject | Re: linux-next requirements | From | Geert Uytterhoeven <> |
| |
On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 02:53, Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 12:25 AM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote: >> Anyway, I sick of these discussions. If people see the way I do >> linux-next as a problem, then they can find someone else. That is not >> the impression I gained at the Kernel Summit and (apart from these >> occasional "discussions") I am quite happy to continue. > > Please don't stop. I'd be screwed.
Yes, I like linux-next, so Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
(This ack doesn't necessarily apply to the rest of the discussion that happened on linux-tip-commits before. I'm gonna pretend I didn't read it ;-).
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
-- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |