Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH 08/12] perf: export some syscall metadata | From | Tom Zanussi <> | Date | Thu, 25 Feb 2010 00:09:53 -0600 |
| |
On Thu, 2010-02-25 at 02:52 +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 12:00:43AM -0600, Tom Zanussi wrote: > > You can skip the syscall metadata patches (7-11) and things will still > > work - you'll just get syscall numbers in the output instead of the > > nicer syscall names. > > > > When the event injection stuff is ready, I can re-implement those > > patches on top of it - it shouldn't be a big deal. > > > Yeah, this looks more reasonable I think. The 7th patch can still > go on though, as it deals with syscall numbers, not yet names, so > it's fine. > > Ah and I'm keeping the 12th patch too (documentation) with some > few modifications, just to tell people syscall names are not yet > supported. > > I've tested the set and played with it. It works very well. > > Actually this work is just amazing. It's so easy to generate > a script for any perf.data, with the right things inside, easy > to modify as the callbacks are intuitive. > > I'm pushing that right away so happily... >
Great! Thanks for reviewing and pushing it all.
Tom
| |