lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [Feb]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 12/12] Kconfig and Makefiles to enable configuration and building of AppArmor.
Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> Quoting john.johansen@canonical.com (john.johansen@canonical.com):
>> From: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>
>>

<< snip >>

>> +config SECURITY_APPARMOR_NETWORK
>> + bool "AppArmor network support"
>> + depends on SECURITY_APPARMOR
>> + default n
>> + help
>> + This enables AppArmor to mediate applications network use.
>> + This will enable the SECURITY_NETWORK hooks.
>
> Is there a compelling reason to have SECURITY_APPARMOR_NETWORK? Does
> it impact performance? Is there older userspace that will just break?
>
No, not really anymore. There used to be a case where I was building
with network hooks off and this has just been carried forward.

So it can go along with config APPARMOR_24_COMPAT, and I have even
been considering pulling the runtime disable as well as I don't
think there is a case for that either.


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2010-02-23 08:47    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans