Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 23 Feb 2010 12:49:42 -0800 | From | "H. Peter Anvin" <> | Subject | Re: linux-next requirements (Was: Re: [tip:x86/ptrace] ptrace: Add support for generic PTRACE_GETREGSET/PTRACE_SETREGSET) |
| |
On 02/23/2010 12:20 PM, Roland McGrath wrote: >> Are there any downsides to Roland's patch as far as PARISC is concerned >> (apart from the loss of some functionality, of course)? > > Kyle ACK'd my parisc patch, and my impression is he wants it to go in > and does not plan to work on the necessary arch support imminently. > > I think the only visible effect of turning off HAVE_ARCH_TRACEHOOK > on parisc will be that /proc/pid/syscall is not available.
Added to tip:x86/ptrace.
-hpa
-- H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
| |