[lkml]   [2010]   [Feb]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
Subjectlinux-next requiements (Was: Re: [tip:x86/ptrace] ptrace: Add support for generic PTRACE_GETREGSET/PTRACE_SETREGSET)
Hi Ingo,

On Mon, 22 Feb 2010 10:07:10 +0100 Ingo Molnar <> wrote:
> I'll keep them in tip:master to get them tested, but note that i cannot push
> any of these patches into linux-next until this is fixed, as linux-next
> requires all architectures to build, with no regard to which architectures are
> tested by kernel testers in practice.

I merely expect people not to push known broken code into linux-next.
linux-next breaks on all sorts of architectures all the time (check One of the reasons
linux-next exists is so that all kernel developers don't have to build
test on all architectures all the time. (And, yes, I know that linux-next
doesn't build all architectures or all configs.)

That being said, I will complain about breakages on some architectures
more than others since they are in my personal builds (as opposed to the
over night builds).

That being said (:-)), I am sure that the PARISC guys would appreciate
the original problem being fixed.
Stephen Rothwell
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
 \ /
  Last update: 2010-02-22 10:35    [W:0.077 / U:6.980 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site