lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [Feb]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Improving OOM killer
On Tue, 2 Feb 2010 18:12:41 -0800 (PST)
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> wrote:

> On Wed, 3 Feb 2010, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
>
> > I stopped that as I mentioned. I'm heavily disappointed with myself and
> > would like not to touch oom-killer things for a while.
> >
> > I'd like to conentrate on memcg for a while, which I've starved for these 3 months.
> >
> > Then, you don't need to CC me.
> >
>
> I'm disappointed to hear that, it would be helpful to get some consensus
> on the points that we can all agree on from different perspectives. I'll
> try to find some time to develop a solution that people will see as a move
> in the positive direction.
>
> On a seperate topic, do you have time to repost your sysctl cleanup for
> Andrew from http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126457416729672 with the
> #ifndef CONFIG_MMU fix I mentioned?
>
I'll not. Feel free to reuse fragments I posted.

Thanks,
-Kame



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2010-02-03 03:17    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans