lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [Feb]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: Improving OOM killer
    On Tue, 2 Feb 2010 18:12:41 -0800 (PST)
    David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> wrote:

    > On Wed, 3 Feb 2010, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
    >
    > > I stopped that as I mentioned. I'm heavily disappointed with myself and
    > > would like not to touch oom-killer things for a while.
    > >
    > > I'd like to conentrate on memcg for a while, which I've starved for these 3 months.
    > >
    > > Then, you don't need to CC me.
    > >
    >
    > I'm disappointed to hear that, it would be helpful to get some consensus
    > on the points that we can all agree on from different perspectives. I'll
    > try to find some time to develop a solution that people will see as a move
    > in the positive direction.
    >
    > On a seperate topic, do you have time to repost your sysctl cleanup for
    > Andrew from http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126457416729672 with the
    > #ifndef CONFIG_MMU fix I mentioned?
    >
    I'll not. Feel free to reuse fragments I posted.

    Thanks,
    -Kame



    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2010-02-03 03:17    [W:0.029 / U:160.284 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site