[lkml]   [2010]   [Feb]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 34/35] x86: use num_processors for possible cpus
On 02/17/2010 06:38 PM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>> I'm confused by this one. This would seem to mean that unless you're
>> specifying possible_cpus= then you are not treating anything as
>> hotpluggable.
>> This is clearly wrong, and it would appear to go the wrong direction in
>> terms of what is safe.
>> What am I missing here?
> per_cpu setup will allocate some mem for every cpu according to possible cpus.

Yes, and I have repeatedly requested that we allocate the memory on the
first up of a disabled CPU rather than eagerly, but in *most*
configurations the amount is relatively small.

> no spec says that we should disable cpus entries in MADT as hotplug cpus.

Reality seems to, though. Consider the bug report that led to patch
681ee44d40d7c93b42118320e4620d07d8704fd6 for example.

> also how many system that support hotplug cpus there?

In terms of physical machines, not all that many; however, it is getting
common to use CPU hotplug for virtual environments so they can be
dynamically scaled.


 \ /
  Last update: 2010-02-18 18:29    [W:0.094 / U:3.432 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site