[lkml]   [2010]   [Feb]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Linux mdadm superblock question.
On 16/02/2010 03:18, wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Feb 2010, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>> On 02/15/2010 04:27 PM, Neil Brown wrote:
>> There are three options:
>> a) either don't boot from it (separate /boot);
>> b) use a bootloader which installs in the MBR and
>> hopefully-unpartitioned disk areas (e.g. Grub);
>> c) use a nonstandard custom MBR.
>> Neither (b) or (c), of course, allow for chainloading from another OS
>> install and thus are bad for interoperability.
> I have had no problems with XFS partitions and lilo as the bootloader.
> I've been doing this for a couple of years now without realizing that
> there is supposed to be a problem.

There isn't, if you use partitions. It could (would) go wrong if you
tried to put an XFS filesystem, or md RAID with a v1.1 superblock, on a
whole disc without a partition table *and* you tried to put a bootloader
on. I can't say it's ever occurred to me to do that, because I always
assumed that whatever I put in a partition used all of it, and I
couldn't expect to double-book the beginning of it and have it work.



 \ /
  Last update: 2010-02-16 05:45    [W:0.053 / U:2.516 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site