lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [Feb]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] delayacct: align to 8 byte boundary on 64-bit systems
On 02/12/2010 01:19 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Feb 2010 11:48:27 -0500
> Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com> wrote:
>
>> prepare_reply sets up an skb for the response. If I understand it correctly,
>> the payload contains:
>>
>> +--------------------------------+
>> | genlmsghdr - 4 bytes |
>> +--------------------------------+
>> | NLA header - 4 bytes | /* Aggregate header */
>> +-+------------------------------+
>> | | NLA header - 4 bytes | /* PID header */
>> | +------------------------------+
>> | | pid/tgid - 4 bytes |
>
> So we put another four zero bytes in here and add four to the "PID header".
>
>> | +------------------------------+
>> | | NLA header - 4 bytes | /* stats header */
>> | + -----------------------------+ <- oops. aligned on 4 byte boundary
>> | | struct taskstats - 328 bytes |
>> +-+------------------------------+
>>
>> The start of the taskstats struct must be 8 byte aligned on IA64 (and other
>> systems with 8 byte alignment rules for 64-bit types) or runtime alignment
>> warnings will be issued.
>>
>> This patch pads the pid/tgid field out to sizeof(long), which forces
>> the alignment of taskstats. The getdelays userspace code is ok with this
>> since it assumes 32-bit pid/tgid and then honors that header's length field.
>>
>> An array is used to avoid exposing kernel memory contents to userspace in the
>> response.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
>> ---
>> kernel/taskstats.c | 8 +++++++-
>> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> --- a/kernel/taskstats.c
>> +++ b/kernel/taskstats.c
>> @@ -362,6 +362,12 @@ static struct taskstats *mk_reply(struct
>> struct nlattr *na, *ret;
>> int aggr;
>>
>> + /* If we don't pad, we end up with alignment on a 4 byte boundary.
>> + * This causes lots of runtime warnings on systems requiring 8 byte
>> + * alignment */
>> + u32 pids[2] = { pid, 0 };
>> + int pid_size = ALIGN(sizeof(pid), sizeof(long));
>> +
>> aggr = (type == TASKSTATS_TYPE_PID)
>> ? TASKSTATS_TYPE_AGGR_PID
>> : TASKSTATS_TYPE_AGGR_TGID;
>> @@ -369,7 +375,7 @@ static struct taskstats *mk_reply(struct
>> na = nla_nest_start(skb, aggr);
>> if (!na)
>> goto err;
>> - if (nla_put(skb, type, sizeof(pid), &pid) < 0)
>> + if (nla_put(skb, type, pid_size, pids) < 0)
>> goto err;
>> ret = nla_reserve(skb, TASKSTATS_TYPE_STATS, sizeof(struct taskstats));
>> if (!ret)
>
> So any code which assumes that the pid/tgid field is four bytes long
> will break. Code which takes that length from the netlink message
> header will work OK.
>
> 32-bit architectures are unaltered.
>
> Seems safe enough. We'd be safer still if we didn't do this on 64-bit
> architectures which don't need it. ie: x86_64. But if we do that we
> add a risk that people will develop shoddy code which works on x86_64
> and doesn't work on ia64.

Is there a way to do that without needlessly complicating things? I
didn't see any existing infrastructure to do that.

Another option was to put an empty attribute in with a garbage type,
which would add a 4 byte header - but even the getdelays code included
with the kernel can't deal with that.

It's ugly all the way around.

-Jeff

--
Jeff Mahoney
SUSE Labs


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2010-02-12 20:23    [W:0.099 / U:0.712 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site