lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [Feb]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] sysfs: differentiate between locking links and non-links
Hello,

On 02/12/2010 10:20 AM, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> My reasoning is that we effectively get an active reference on directories
> for free because we have to delete the children before we can delete a
> directory.

Yeah, as long as we guarantee that all children are removed before the
parent, I think we're in the clear. The group handling seems
problematic (w/ or w/o the patch) but yeap Ack on removing
get_active_two.

Thanks.

--
tejun


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2010-02-12 03:11    [W:0.085 / U:12.776 seconds]
©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site