[lkml]   [2010]   [Feb]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [patch v2 0/4] updated ptrace/core-dump patches for supporting xstate - V2
On 02/10/2010 07:45 PM, Roland McGrath wrote:
>> We're happy to carry the patches as long as it's okay with you. We were
>> mostly wondering if you preferred any other kind of workflow.
> When I write patches myself, I always use git, so it is always easy and
> most convenient for me to have my own branches pulled directly just to
> save on 'git rebase' churn later.
> As to a regular workflow of using a well-known branch of mine, I think it
> makes sense for me to maintain a branch if there is an area where things
> are presumptively merged just on my approval and I'm the one who has to be
> lobbied to revert them. I have not heretofore acquired the sensation that
> this was the case with any given area of code.

LOL, okay :)


H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.

 \ /
  Last update: 2010-02-11 05:21    [W:0.048 / U:23.908 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site