Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 10 Feb 2010 20:16:24 -0800 | From | "H. Peter Anvin" <> | Subject | Re: [patch v2 0/4] updated ptrace/core-dump patches for supporting xstate - V2 |
| |
On 02/10/2010 07:45 PM, Roland McGrath wrote: >> We're happy to carry the patches as long as it's okay with you. We were >> mostly wondering if you preferred any other kind of workflow. > > When I write patches myself, I always use git, so it is always easy and > most convenient for me to have my own branches pulled directly just to > save on 'git rebase' churn later. > > As to a regular workflow of using a well-known branch of mine, I think it > makes sense for me to maintain a branch if there is an area where things > are presumptively merged just on my approval and I'm the one who has to be > lobbied to revert them. I have not heretofore acquired the sensation that > this was the case with any given area of code.
LOL, okay :)
-hpa
-- H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
| |