[lkml]   [2010]   [Feb]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [WTF] ... is going on with current->fs->{root,mnt} accesses in pohmelfs
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 11:59:39AM +0000, Al Viro ( wrote:
> > Let me guess... Mmmm, it was in the yesterday newspaper, I remember.
> > Maybe when we chroot somewhere. I meant not mounted fs root, but
> > thread's root.
> Why would a filesystem give a damn about the chroot of syscall originator
> in the first place?

That's the point - it is not needed.

> > > Why not use the dentries you've been given by VFS?
> >
> > At writeback we do not have parents, so must find a path somehow.
> Most of the places do have those just fine and unlike the writeback,
> rename really care which pathname is being dealt with...

POHMELFS uses writeback cache also for metadata, so effectively most of
such operations are also postponed. Later I turned that off though.

> BTW, what prevents writeback vs. rename races?

There are proper locks for such operations.

Evgeniy Polyakov

 \ /
  Last update: 2010-02-10 14:33    [W:0.034 / U:31.052 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site