[lkml]   [2010]   [Dec]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 16/16] ptrace: remove the extra wake_up_process() from ptrace_detach()
    Hello, Roland.

    On 12/07/2010 01:10 AM, Roland McGrath wrote:
    > The plain wake_up_process was certainly wrong from the beginning.
    > We were conservative about changing it because of the difficulty of
    > chasing all the corners where userland debuggers' behavior might be
    > made to regress when it had been reliable in practice before (even
    > if not always in theory, such as possible races that didn't bite in
    > reality). The userland code has gone to many contortions to cope
    > with how the kernel behaved in the past, whether or not that
    > behavior ever made any good sense.
    > For that sort of reason, none of this stuff should change at all in
    > a -stable kernel, nor late in a release cycle.

    Sure, definitely. All these changes are at the earliest for the next
    merge window.

    > For new kernels, I think changing the behavior in the direction of
    > something that can actually be described is OK as long as userland
    > debugger maintainers like Jan agree to the new behavior and that the
    > behavior really and truly does follow an articulated set of rules
    > that the kernel and userland sides agree to.

    Yeap, that sounds good to me.



     \ /
      Last update: 2010-12-07 14:47    [W:0.021 / U:49.928 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site