[lkml]   [2010]   [Dec]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 16/16] ptrace: remove the extra wake_up_process() from ptrace_detach()
Hello, Roland.

On 12/07/2010 01:10 AM, Roland McGrath wrote:
> The plain wake_up_process was certainly wrong from the beginning.
> We were conservative about changing it because of the difficulty of
> chasing all the corners where userland debuggers' behavior might be
> made to regress when it had been reliable in practice before (even
> if not always in theory, such as possible races that didn't bite in
> reality). The userland code has gone to many contortions to cope
> with how the kernel behaved in the past, whether or not that
> behavior ever made any good sense.
> For that sort of reason, none of this stuff should change at all in
> a -stable kernel, nor late in a release cycle.

Sure, definitely. All these changes are at the earliest for the next
merge window.

> For new kernels, I think changing the behavior in the direction of
> something that can actually be described is OK as long as userland
> debugger maintainers like Jan agree to the new behavior and that the
> behavior really and truly does follow an articulated set of rules
> that the kernel and userland sides agree to.

Yeap, that sounds good to me.



 \ /
  Last update: 2010-12-07 14:47    [W:0.287 / U:9.884 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site